NFR har de siste ti\u00e5r gjennomf\u00f8rt to evalueringer av norsk forskning. N\u00e5 er en tredje runde i gang. I november startet to av evalueringene opp:\u00a0biovitenskap<\/strong>\u00a0og\u00a0naturvitenskap<\/strong>.\u00a0I\u00a02023 st\u00e5r de\u00a0resterende\u00a0fagene for tur, organisert i to l\u00f8p:\u00a0\u00c9n evaluering for\u00a0medisin og helse<\/strong>,\u00a0EVALMEDHELSE, der Medisinsk fakultet er med, og\u00a0\u00e9n for\u00a0matematikk,\u00a0IKT\u00a0og teknologi<\/strong>.<\/p>\n Hovedm\u00e5let for evalueringen er \u00e5 evaluere kvalitet og rammebetingelser for livsvitenskapelig forskning i Norge.<\/p>\n Det legges opp til evaluering av to niv\u00e5er: Administrative enheter og forskningsgrupper. De administrative enhetene vil for Medisinsk fakultet v\u00e6re instituttene, alts\u00e5 K2 for v\u00e5r del. N\u00e5r det gjelder forskningsgrupper, er det en stor fordel for K2 at vi alt har forskningsgrupper som er definert. NFR har bestemt at minstekravene for en forskningsgruppe skal v\u00e6re at det m\u00e5 minst v\u00e6re fem forskere hvorav minst tre i f\u00f8rstestilling og de m\u00e5 har eksistert i minst tre \u00e5r. Her er det naturligvis rom for egendefinisjoner. NFR oppgir at det er ikke n\u00f8dvendig \u00e5 melde inn alle som er ansatt p\u00e5 et institutt. Det er videre mulig \u00e5 sl\u00e5 sammen grupper som passer sammen. Inndelingen kan dermed v\u00e6re strategisk og en vil naturligvis rapportere p\u00e5 dem som utmerker seg.<\/p>\n NFR vil opprette en rekke ekspertpaneler som skal rapportere til et mindre antall evalueringskomiteer. Disse rapporterer igjen til en nasjonal rapportkomite.<\/p>\n Evalueringskriteriene er blant annet at forskningen skal ha relevans for samfunnet, v\u00e6re relevant for institusjonelle form\u00e5l, arbeide for mangfold og likeverd og ha en solid forskningsproduksjon.<\/p>\n Det vil bli mer informasjon om evalueringen p\u00e5 Faculty Lunch som er onsdag 10. mai.<\/p>\n Instituttledelsen vil i samarbeid med milj\u00f8ene definere forskningsgruppene som skal evalueres. Det skal lages egenevaluering for K2 og for hver forskningsgruppe. Her er det viktig at milj\u00f8ene selv kommer med forslag til hvilke forskningsgrupper som skal defineres.<\/p>\n NFR vil gjennomf\u00f8re et webinar 15. mai 14-15. F\u00f8lg med her<\/a> for mer informasjon.<\/p>\n F\u00f8rste frist for skjematisk tilbakemelding til fakultetet er 5. juni. Selve evalueringen vil ha en frist medio september.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n God helg!<\/p>\n [:en]<\/p>\n Temporary report on RCN’s upcoming evaluation<\/strong><\/p>\n In recent decades, RCN has carried out two evaluations of Norwegian research. Now a third round is underway. In November, two of the evaluations started: life sciences and natural sciences. In 2023, the remaining subjects are due, organized in two rounds: One evaluation for medicine and health, EVALMEDHELSE, in which the Faculty of Medicine is involved, and one for mathematics, IT and technology.<\/p>\n The main aim of the evaluation is to evaluate the quality and framework conditions for life science research in Norway.<\/p>\n Two levels are planned for evaluation: Administrative units and research groups. The administrative units for the Faculty of Medicine will be the institutes, i.e. K2 for us. When it comes to research groups, it is a big advantage for K2 that we all have defined research groups. The RCN has decided that the minimum requirements for a research group must be that there must be at least five researchers, of which at least three are permanent and as main position (at least 50%) \u00a0and they must have existed for at least three years. Here, of course, there is room for individual definitions. NFR states that it is not necessary to register everyone who is employed at an institute. It is also possible to merge groups that fit together. The division can thus be strategic, and one will naturally report on those who are good.<\/p>\n NFR will set up several expert panels that will report to a smaller number of evaluation committees. These in turn report to a national report committee.<\/p>\n The evaluation criteria include that the research must be relevant to society, be relevant for institutional purposes, work for diversity and equality and have a solid research output.<\/p>\n There will be more information about the evaluation at the Faculty Lunch on Wednesday 10 May.<\/p>\n The Department’s management will, in collaboration with the environment, define the research groups to be evaluated. A self-evaluation must be made for K2 and for each research group. Here it is important that the groups themselves come up with proposals for which research groups should be defined.<\/p>\n![\"\"](\"http:\/\/k2info.w.uib.no\/files\/2023\/01\/Pal-Njolstad.jpg\")
<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n